In a submission to an Australian Treasury consultation paper on unfair trading practices protections for small businesses, the Finance Brokers Association of Australia (FBAA) said it wanted to “bring to the government’s attention the unfair trading practices being engaged in by lenders in Australia.”
FBAA CEO Leo Gagic said the broking sector is made up predominantly of small businesses, and that “a broker’s livelihood and ability to function is inextricably linked to credit providers.”
“When managed appropriately, the lender-broker-consumer relationship is a mutually beneficial one, and this is the relationship we are seeking,” he said.
The submission highlighted a range of undesirable practices including clawbacks, pointing out that clawback was intended to stop brokers from being paid for misconduct or non-compliance but has since evolved to clawback being triggered because of borrower conduct.
Mr Gagic said some lenders base clawback calculations around the notion of cost recovery which is unfair and inequitable.
The association also tackled net of offset provisions, calling the way these are being implemented in practice “shocking”, and declaring “slow payments of commission offend the general principles of fairness which are reflected in the expectations set by government under the Payment Times Reporting Act obligations.”
Channel conflict was also raised, with the FBAA submitting, “The desire to build direct channel is causing poor marketplace behaviour including incentivising internal staff to poach and refinance deals originally introduced by third parties, differential pricing whereby a lender will offer an additional rate discount to a customer originally introduced by a broker if the customer refinances through a branch (triggering clawback against the introducing broker in the process) and misrepresentation to customers about the cost of broker commissions increasing the rate they pay.”
The FBAA repeated previous concerns around lenders supporting “unqualified sources and offering payments to accountants, lawyers and others under ‘introducer’ or ‘referral’ arrangements,” pointing out that the Hayne royal commission examined defective introducer programs and found them to cause significant consumer harm.
“The separation of allowing unqualified people to introduce customers for a substantial fee free of clawbacks and other consequences is resulting in anti-competitive behaviours and unfair outcomes against regulated small credit licensee businesses.”
Concern was also expressed over lenders cancelling accreditation of brokers who don’t meet minimum requirements, calling it “repugnant behaviour” that was “more about consolidating direct business over third party channel than protecting consumers.”
Mr Gagic said it was time to end anti-competitive and unfair commercial practices.